Source policy

Sources and attribution

Happy Read Daily uses reputable public sources to discover story leads, then publishes original summaries and context with attribution.

Source material is treated as research input, not copy to reproduce. Each story should add a clear reason the item belongs on a calmer current-news site.

Stories are reviewed for source quality, suitability, duplication and tone before publication.

1

Collect

Public source material is monitored for useful, hopeful or constructive current stories.

2

Review

Potential stories are checked for tone, source strength, ad-safety and whether they avoid tragedy-led framing.

3

Publish

Approved stories add original context, attribution and a calm reader takeaway.

Positive-news sources

Start with reputable sources that already specialise in constructive, useful or lighter current stories.

Section-specific feeds

Use separate source lanes for food, family, wellbeing, nature, bright ideas, home life and good people so one noisy source cannot dominate.

Manual review first

Feeds and APIs are discovery inputs. Human approval stays on until the tone, source pool and bad-news filters are trusted.

Suggested source families

  • Positive-news and constructive-journalism publishers.
  • Food, family, home, wellbeing, conservation and science sources.
  • Official charity, university, local authority and public-interest sources where they add reader value.

Publishing rule

Happy Read Daily should not publish copied or lightly rewritten versions of other sites' stories. The durable route is original context, attribution, links and a clear reason the story matters.

Editorial focus

The site is intentionally kinder than general news, but still current and adult. Good news is welcome. Grim stories with a happy ending are treated carefully or rejected.